It amazes me how the court quotes "separation of church and state" which is entirely made up. It is no where in the Constitution. That is a mantra the liberals have used for years and is a lie. The Constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
How is allowing the practice of any religion unconstitutional I ask. I also do not see anything unconstitutional by the President restricting entry into our country. We do not owe any foreigner anything, we do not have to allow any of them to come to our country. We are a sovereign nation, it is our right to restrict entry and our governments job to protect its citizens by doing so. The liberals are so against anything Christian related, but when it comes to Muslims, they are up in arms defending them even if there is nothing there.
One other thing, the phrase "separation of church and state", if we want to play semantics, isn't Church generally a Christian term? Islam doesn't call their places of worship "churchs".
Wonder if a new religion was started up called "kill USA" with their main stated goal of destroying the US inside out, if the Democrats would object to banning them from entering our country based on "separation of church and state". Of course they would defend them, sometimes I think that is what the Democrats are trying to do to our country anyway.