Graybeard Outdoors
March 13, 2010, 04:18:04 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Members: 35929  •  Posts: 1306543  •  Topics: 168641 •
Please welcome laa, our newest member.
 
  GBO CMS   Home   Help Links Login Register  

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Kirst or R&D Conversion Cylinder??  (Read 380 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Steve E
Trade Count: (1)
Avid Poster
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 238




Ignore
« on: January 10, 2009, 10:08:31 PM »

I have a Pietta 1858 Remy Pistol coming and am interested in getting a 45 Colt conversion cylinder. I guess my choices are between the Kirst and R&D Cylinders.
I like the loading gate of the Kirst but have no actual experience with either. What are the pro's and con's with both of them. Thanks for any info.

              Steve E.........
Logged
buckskin billy
Trade Count: (0)
Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 15



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2009, 11:23:34 AM »

 i have no experience with the conversion cylinders, but i thought r and d offered one with a gate on it as well.
 r and d has been building conversion guns longer than any one else. he builds them for tom sellect's western movies and because of r and d gun shop, they are the reason we are able to buy conversion replicas today.
 kirst has a simple conversion kit that looks like any one can do it. the ones i've seen look to be well made.
 r and d has done some gun smithing work for me, and i'm very please with the job that was done.
 i think either one would be good
Logged

face your fear, accept your war, it is what it is
thebuckrub.proboards91.com
jls
Trade Count: (0)
Avid Poster
**
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 110




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2009, 07:54:33 PM »

steve, I have a r+d on my pietta and have had no problems what so ever. I had to remove a small amount of metal in the cylinder window in front of the bolt for clearance( took about 5 mins) but r+d said that might have to be done.other than that, no issues. the kirst kit requires a channel cut in the recoil shield but a dremel tool or die grinder will do it. hope this helps some.
Logged
Flint
Moderator
Trade Count: (0)
A Real Regular
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 977



« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2009, 12:52:24 PM »

Kirst offers both versions, last I knew, a gated and ungated version, R&D's is ungated.  Pros and Cons to me vary depending on the gun involved.

For a Remington, loading and unloading is actually faster ungated, by removing the cylinder, separating the backplate and ejecting empties and reloading, reassemble the gun.  To use the gate, like a Colt SAA or Remington 75, you must eject each fired case individually (presuming you have an installed ejector rod) and reload individually.

You can unload/reload a Kirst gated by removing the cylinder as well, if speed is needed.

With the colt cap & ball, removing the cylinder is a much more tedious affair, removing the wedge and drifting off the barrel before removing the cylinder.  On the open frame Colt type, a gated version, made by both Kirst and R&D, is faster and easier, as well as more authentic.
Logged

Flint, SASS 976, NRA Life
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



To Donate to the GBO server fund. Click Here for more info



GBO Partner
GBO Partner OutsideHub

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.258 seconds with 30 queries.