Graybeard Outdoors
March 18, 2010, 04:34:36 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Members: 35995  •  Posts: 1310199  •  Topics: 169031 •
Please welcome Zockenoummike, our newest member.
 
  GBO CMS   Home   Help Links Login Register  

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The effect of a powder chamber on VELOCITY  (Read 1041 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Cat Whisperer
Moderator
Trade Count: (2)
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5136


Pulaski Coehorn Works


WWW
« on: May 22, 2005, 07:27:53 AM »

If you read through the article on handgonne's:

http://www.musketeer.ch/blackpowder/handgonne.html

you will find, right after the use of the ballistic pendulum, a few paragraphs on the effect of increasing velocity that the addition of a powder chamber makes.

I'd always figured that it was only to increase the strength around the powder - added benefits of greater velocity!
Logged

Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)
paste coordinates into http://mapper.acme.com/
Will Bison
Trade Count: (0)
A Real Regular
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 569




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2005, 10:57:06 AM »

That was interesting reading. It's hard to argue with empirical testing. If I were to hazard a casual guess, I would have gone with the full bore tube as producing a higher velocity. My rationale would have been that the expanding gas has a greater distance to act upon the projectile. Live and learn.

Also of interest that someone actually still uses a ballistic pendulum. The last one I saw was the one I built in 1964.

Thanks for the interesting link Tim.
Logged
jeeper1
Trade Count: (0)
A Real Regular
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 536




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2005, 03:11:53 PM »

I have been aware of how much a powder chamber helps for quite some time. Look at the distance differences between a 37mm launcher and a 40mm launcher. The powder chamber is worth 4 times the distance.
Logged

I may not be completely sane, but at least I don't think I have the power to influence the weather.
Cat Whisperer
Moderator
Trade Count: (2)
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5136


Pulaski Coehorn Works


WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2005, 04:01:31 PM »

Quote from: jeeper1
I have been aware of how much a powder chamber helps for quite some time. Look at the distance differences between a 37mm launcher and a 40mm launcher. The powder chamber is worth 4 times the distance.


Interesting!  (and here I'll show my ignorance, which is which?)  I assume you're talking M79/M203 vs civilian version & the powder chamber would be in the shell casing.
Logged

Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)
paste coordinates into http://mapper.acme.com/
jeeper1
Trade Count: (0)
A Real Regular
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 536




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2005, 06:48:48 PM »

Yep.
 The 40mm is mostly military usage and the 37mm is mostly civilian usage.
The 37mm cases have 3 basic designs for the inside of the bases from flat to concave.
The 40mm's have two common designs.
One is a spherical hollow  with several vent holes at an angle.
The other uses a 38 blank cartridge with several variations of vent hole layouts. Both are high pressure chambers which vent the burning gasses to a low pressure chamber to push the projectile out the barrel.
The 37mm will launch a projectile little more than 100 yds. The 40mm will easily go more than 400 yds with the same weight projectile.
Logged

I may not be completely sane, but at least I don't think I have the power to influence the weather.
Cat Whisperer
Moderator
Trade Count: (2)
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5136


Pulaski Coehorn Works


WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2005, 07:08:44 PM »

jeeper1 -

Thanks, that adds a another bit to our storehouse of knowledge.
Logged

Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)
paste coordinates into http://mapper.acme.com/
jeeper1
Trade Count: (0)
A Real Regular
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 536




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2005, 06:46:18 AM »

If you want pictures that show the differences then email me at  rlachance@earthlink.net  since some of the pictures are copyrighted.
Logged

I may not be completely sane, but at least I don't think I have the power to influence the weather.
Cat Whisperer
Moderator
Trade Count: (2)
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5136


Pulaski Coehorn Works


WWW
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2005, 06:21:58 PM »

Quote from: jeeper1
If you want pictures that show the differences then email me at  rlachance@earthlink.net  since some of the pictures are copyrighted.


Thanks for the offer!  I do recall looking into a few of the empties (back in 1972 or so) and seeing the raised area in the middle of the case - didn't attach it to the idea of a powder chamber until now.
Logged

Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)
paste coordinates into http://mapper.acme.com/
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  



To Donate to the GBO server fund. Click Here for more info



GBO Partner
GBO Partner OutsideHub

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.449 seconds with 38 queries.