Illinois' Record $47 Billion Loss Ignored By Mainstream Media. Why? - Graybeard Outdoors
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-10-2019, 02:34 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
tdoyka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: windber, pa
Posts: 657
Send a message via MSN to tdoyka
Default Illinois' Record $47 Billion Loss Ignored By Mainstream Media. Why?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...ream-media-why

Illinois' Record $47 Billion Loss Ignored By Mainstream Media. Why?
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Mon, 09/09/2019 - 18:45
Authored by Mark Glennon via WirePoints.org,

The State of Illinois recently reported its biggest annual financial loss ever. Instead of clear reporting on that, we’ve seen perhaps the most glaring example yet of how the state’s finances can be misunderstood, misreported and intentionally distorted.

The loss of $47 billion for the state’s 2018 fiscal year, shown in audited financial statements released late last month, is an astonishing number. For some perspective, that’s about $7 billion more than the entire, current annual budget.

But most of the regular press downplayed or entirely ignored the loss. Many even saw good news. A Reuters headline, for example, read “Illinois budget deficit shrank to $7.8 billion in FY 2018.” You can find similar headlines from across the state.

Why would media coverage differ so drastically from what the audited financial statements really said? Which is right?

Two factors account for the difference, and both should be understood. This is a lesson in how misunderstanding of our financial crisis is created and propagated.

First, the loss was shrugged off because it stemmed mostly from an accounting change, which we will explain below. But that’s only a partial excuse. In truth, the accounting change exposed a huge liability that has been all but ignored in the past.

Second, most media reports seem to have blindly repeated a very misleading press release by the Illinois Comptroller that accompanied the financials.

Some background before we elaborate: The new financial statements are in the state’s recently released, long overdue CAFR — the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year that ended in June 2018. The $47 billion loss is shown in the statements as a drop in “net position,” which is the government’s rough equivalent of net worth that you commonly see in the private sector. Changes in it are comparable to net income. As the CAFR itself says, “Over time, increases and decreases in net position measure whether the State’s financial position is improving or deteriorating.”

The big loss was overwhelmingly due to an accounting change that had a $42 billion impact. That change was for healthcare costs owed in the future to state retirees, called OPEBs (other post-employment benefits). In Illinois, those benefits are constitutionally protected just like pensions. Unlike pensions, however, they are entirely unfunded. New accounting rules now taking effect require full disclosure of that liability, which the CAFR says totals $55 billion.

But should we dismiss the massive loss as a bookkeeping quirk? Hardly.

While the $42 billion loss didn’t occur in one year, it’s a growing monster that has been hidden for many years, unknown to most reporters and the public. Including it now as part of the state’s financial report card is an admission about how deficient previous reporting has been. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board couldn’t keep a straight face any longer as it watched governments like Illinois hide OPEB obligations, so it issued a new standard requiring better disclosure, which is now fully in effect.

The simple is fact is that the state’s true condition is indeed a full $47 billion worse than most Illinoisans were told a year ago. That’s because the regular media, like the accountants, have long ignored OPEB liabilities. If you know about them it’s probably only because you read about them here or in other alternate sources, or have expertise in the area.

The chart below shows the full story properly over time. Since 2002 the state has lost $178 billion. The big jump down in 2015 was also due to an accounting change. There have been other, smaller ones. However, had the proper accounting rules been in place from the start, the line would still end in the same place. Its downward slope would only have been less jagged.



The second reason why the 2018 loss wasn’t reported properly was misleading spin put on by Illinois Comptroller Susana Mendoza when she released the CAFR. Her press release starts as follows:

ILLINOIS CUT ITS DEFICIT IN HALF IN FISCAL YEAR 2018, ANNUAL CAFR SHOWS

The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) released today shows Illinois cut its general funds deficit by $6.849 billion — from a deficit of $14.612 billion in fiscal year 2017 to a deficit of $7.763 billion in fiscal year 2018. That is largely because of a refinancing of state debt from high-interest to low-interest repayment.

Many news stories repeated that or something like it with happy headlines like “Annual report: Illinois cuts deficit in half in fiscal year 2018.” Most of those stories buried the huge loss and the OPEB issue or didn’t mention them at all A notable exception was The Bond Buyer, with a more appropriate headline, “Illinois CAFR arrives, late and covered in red ink.”



Comptroller Susana Mendoza

In truth, Mendoza cherry-picked an extremely unrepresentative element of the CAFR. Note that she referred only to the “general funds” to claim the deficit reduction. The general funds are only part of the picture, and they effectively count borrowed money as if it is income!

It’s like claiming you cut your losses in half by putting that half on a credit card. During the year, Illinois sold bonds to pay down $6.5 billion of its huge backlog of unpaid bills. Refinancing from one debt to another in that manner has little genuine impact, aside from some interesting savings that, for 2018, would be a tiny portion of the supposed deficit reduction.

This is a common trick politicians use. I checked in with Sheila Weinberg, CEO of Truth in Accounting, about the Illinois CAFR issue. She repeated what she has long taught: “General fund accounting is incomplete and misleading, for many reasons including the fact that bond proceeds are accounted for as income.” (For those interested in the details, see the page from the CAFR reproduced below listing all the items ignored in the Governmental Funds, which include the general fund, which is why it is so misleading.)

Mendoza certainly had a different lens on CAFR numbers two years ago when we had a governor she didn’t like, Bruce Rauner. Her press release for the 2016 CAFR started as follows, focusing on the entire net position instead of just general funds:

With no relief in sight, Illinois’ finances deteriorated at an alarming rate in fiscal year 2016 as net deficit totals spiked to a staggering $126.7 billion…. The State’s [CAFR] paints a worsening outlook for the State’s financial future on this unsustainable path. Mendoza said the CAFR findings reflect a lawless fiscal climate.

Well, that “staggering” negative $126.7 billion is now negative $184 billion. It had worsened by $5.8 billion under that “lawless fiscal climate,” which is about the same as last year if you ignore the OPEB loss. No moral outrage now from Mendoza, however.

I called Abdon Pallasch, Mendoza’s press director, to comment on why I thought her most recent press release is so misleading. “It’s all in the CAFR” that was published, he said, adding that they selected the parts they did, focused on the general fund, and that those wishing to write about other aspects can look at the other sections.

Yes, literally read, Mendoza’s press release is correct. I say it’s also grossly misleading.

Keep in mind that the 2018 fiscal year was an unusually good year in the markets, which temporarily reduced the state’s deficit. Stocks returned some 14% that year, about twice what the state pensions assume they will return per year. That allowed the pensions to actually improve a bit – the net unfunded pension liability shrank by $4 billion to $134 billion. Had they deteriorated as rapidly as they typically do, the overall report would have been far worse.

Finally, if you’ve been wondering how much the recent state income tax hikes would solve, you now have the answer. Those increases took effect at the start of the fiscal year covered by the new CAFR. They obviously didn’t materially change the state’s direction downward, even if you ignore the OPEB issue.

Page 39 from CAFR, listing matters not recorded in Governmental Funds that do impact change in net position:

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/i...?itok=xe-NB5nC

Tears on a river
Push on a shove
It don't mean much
Joker on jack
Match on a fire
Cold on ice
As a dead man's touch
Whisper on a scream
Doesn't change a thing
Doesn't bring you back
Blue on black
-KWS
tdoyka is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-10-2019, 05:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 2,375
Default

Sounds like they have to account for accumulated debts promised in the future - just like any non government organization. Most government entities DON'T carry the future obligations on the books because it makes them look worse. Take the US government, they don't carry the ACCRUED LIABILITY for Social Security or Medicare on the books. In stead they use those surplus revenues (but not liabilities) to reduce the "stated" national deficit. Without this trick the national debt would be even higher than it is.

Really this is just making government play by the same rules as the private sector. This is also what happened to the US Postal Service, they now need to PRE-FUND all retirement benefits instead of just letting them pile up - thus the rate increases and losses.
NWBear is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-10-2019, 06:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,794
Default

We could build the wall 10 times for that much money...
Mule 11 is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-10-2019, 06:25 PM
Moderator
 
conan the librarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 23,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NWBear View Post
Sounds like they have to account for accumulated debts promised in the future - just like any non government organization. Most government entities DON'T carry the future obligations on the books because it makes them look worse. Take the US government, they don't carry the ACCRUED LIABILITY for Social Security or Medicare on the books. In stead they use those surplus revenues (but not liabilities) to reduce the "stated" national deficit. Without this trick the national debt would be even higher than it is.

Really this is just making government play by the same rules as the private sector. This is also what happened to the US Postal Service, they now need to PRE-FUND all retirement benefits instead of just letting them pile up - thus the rate increases and losses.
Dang! You da man! Youse is goood! Great post.

Last edited by conan the librarian; 09-10-2019 at 06:50 PM.
conan the librarian is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-10-2019, 06:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: alabama
Posts: 2,812
Default

Theres going to be some mad pensioners when that check stops coming .
mcbammer is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-11-2019, 07:05 AM
Super Moderator
 
land_owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Live - Cocoa, FL; Hunt - Mims, FL; Lk. Poincette, FL; Union, SC
Posts: 9,928
Gun Cabinet
Send a message via Skype™ to land_owner
Default

Turn out the lights, the Party's over.

Promises from exposed sphincter BLUE State Politicians can not be trusted - except by those too deaf, dumb, and blind to hear, speak, see, or CARE.

The Public Dole is running out of OTHER PEOPLE'S money. The Lemming population will be hungry. With nothing but empty promises to eat, they will have no place to go other than to lay down and die. The Left Leaning Looneys will have themselves to blame for their final misery but won't see it that way. They will point their starved, haggard, and poverty ridden fingers at Republicans and say it was Trump's fault for not "caring enough" to protect them from themselves.

BLUE children need to be spanked early and often.
land_owner is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old 09-11-2019, 10:47 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,114
Default

Lived 30 years in the suck that was Illinois 25 odd years ago. Still return to visit family fairly often. I never fail to be astonished at the clear rot of the carcass that was once a powerful state.

It was bloated for a while, (I left, never looking to return) then when that burst it slowly shrank and smelled bad. What one sees now are what the carrion eaters have left, hide and hair stretched over dry bones, and a stain left on the earth.

Illinois will become a relatively poor agricultural state, with a few large cities that struggle to retain their dignity. That struggle is depleting what is left in the treasury.

Michigan 2.0 if you will.


I need a kinder gentler machine gun

**Concealed Carry...Because when seconds count help is only minutes away**
Empty Quiver is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Graybeard Outdoors forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome