Few are more stupid than this.. - Graybeard Outdoors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-07-2019, 09:18 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
ironglow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: rural southwestern N.Y. State
Posts: 41,835
Default Few are more stupid than this..

.
The Hildebeast calls Tulsi Gabbard a "Russian tool".. Tulsi is a combat veteran and a major in the Hawaii NG !

https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/hill...russian-tools/

This is truly crazy, Tulsi is just about the only present candidate for president that the democrats have, who may not be nuts !

https://ontheissues.org/House/Tulsi_Gabbard.htm

So what does the 'party of idiots' do? They attack her as an enemy... more proof they are totally deranged !

.

I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion. (Alexander the Great)

Last edited by ironglow; 11-07-2019 at 09:21 AM.
ironglow is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-07-2019, 01:04 PM
Senior Member
 
tdoyka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: windber, pa
Posts: 1,417
Send a message via MSN to tdoyka
Default

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...roy_trump.html

this was already said.
Gabbard is hardly a thinker and never had principles, only preferences. Her comment’s conclusion is the equivalent of, and is as relativistically nonsensical, as speaking of “personal truth.” If it’s personal, it’s not morality. It then has a different name: taste. (Moreover, all just law reflects morality and is thus “religious,” as I explain here and here.)
Gabbard, power-prostitute style, never had principles and will say anything to get elected (conservative suckers for pretty faces, take note).
Both of the above.
All this said and in accordance with Occam’s razor, I freely admit that my third-party-plot theory isn’t the most likely explanation here. Leftists are emotion-driven creatures, and **** hath no fury like a Hillary scorned. So maybe Clinton’s bitterness was again showing. It’s also true that Gabbard claims to have dismissed running third party.

But she has flip-flopped before. Moreover, all the attention such an effort would bring — the media could want to maximize this “centrist’s” exposure — may appeal to Gabbard’s vanity. And, oh, harking back to Rucker’s Libertarian Party theory, note that the congresswoman’s not-“government's role to define and enforce our personal morality” line is right out of libertarians’ playbook. She’s not exactly an odd fit.

take a look at $15/hr, healthscare, immigration.......she is a true socialist or communist.

“All that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combated, suppressed — only to emerge all the more powerfully, all the more triumphantly from the struggle.”
― Nikola Tesla
tdoyka is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-07-2019, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
 
bugeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Soon to be elsewhere.
Posts: 18,912
Default

She's still a democrat, higher taxes, baby butchery, etc.
But, it's funny when hildabeast makes her wild Russia claims after she herself sold (illegally) Russia a large part of our uranium.

HEAVEN HAS A WALL, A GATE, AND A STRICT IMMIGRATION POLICY.
H*LL HAS OPEN BORDERS. taken from fox news

DEMOCRATS/ABORTIONISTS SHOULD TAKE HEED OF THE FACT THAT BABIES ARE GOD'S MOST PRECIOUS.

MURDER BABIES AND YOU "WILL" BURN FOR ETERNITY.
bugeye is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-07-2019, 01:59 PM
Senior Member
 
tdoyka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: windber, pa
Posts: 1,417
Send a message via MSN to tdoyka
Default

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ore-breitbart/

Tulsi Gabbard to Breitbart News: Democrats ‘Certainly Not’ Anti-war Anymore
JOEL B. POLLAK7 Nov 20193103
2:46
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) told Breitbart News on Thursday morning that Democrats no longer deserved to be called an “anti-war” party, because they simply opposed everything that President Donald Trump had done.
Gabbard joined Breitbart News Daily on Sirius XM Patriot 125 for a live interview with Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow, who asked her if Democrats still deserved to be known as an “anti-war” party. She said they did not. Certainly, not anymore,” she said.

“Rather than actually standing up for the best interest of our country, standing up for the best interest of our people and for peace, decisions are made and criticisms are levied based on, well, if it’s a president from the other party, then we’re going to stand up against everything they do. And this is something we see on both sides of the aisle,” she said.

That is not to say Gabbard approved of President Trump’s withdrawal of troops from Syria. She accused him of violating his promise to pull out of the country, saying that he was simply “moving from one part of Syria to another part of Syria.”

That, she continued, was allowing Turkey to begin “ethnic cleansing and slaughter” of the Kurds. Moreover, she said, President Trump’s open policy of controlling oil facilities in Syria smacked of “naked imperialism.”

She also opposed sanctions on the Syrian regime, because the victims of those sanctions were the Syrian people, she said.

Gabbard said the U.S. should use special forces to attack terrorist groups in Syria when necessary, but then leave, rather than waging what she called “regime change war.”

Marlow asked Gabbard about criticisms of her 2017 meeting with Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad. She said she had brought up the issue of free and fair elections in the country, and that he had agreed, in principle.

Asked about Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Gabbard said there were still disputes as to whether the attacks that had prompted American military action had actually happened.

She opposed U.S. military support for Saudi Arabia, and said the U.S. should return to the Iran nuclear deal, which she said would help stop that country from building nuclear weapons.

“All that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combated, suppressed — only to emerge all the more powerfully, all the more triumphantly from the struggle.”
― Nikola Tesla
tdoyka is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-12-2019, 12:28 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
ironglow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: rural southwestern N.Y. State
Posts: 41,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tdoyka View Post
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...roy_trump.html

this was already said.
Gabbard is hardly a thinker and never had principles, only preferences. Her comment’s conclusion is the equivalent of, and is as relativistically nonsensical, as speaking of “personal truth.” If it’s personal, it’s not morality. It then has a different name: taste. (Moreover, all just law reflects morality and is thus “religious,” as I explain here and here.)
Gabbard, power-prostitute style, never had principles and will say anything to get elected (conservative suckers for pretty faces, take note).
Both of the above.
All this said and in accordance with Occam’s razor, I freely admit that my third-party-plot theory isn’t the most likely explanation here. Leftists are emotion-driven creatures, and **** hath no fury like a Hillary scorned. So maybe Clinton’s bitterness was again showing. It’s also true that Gabbard claims to have dismissed running third party.

But she has flip-flopped before. Moreover, all the attention such an effort would bring — the media could want to maximize this “centrist’s” exposure — may appeal to Gabbard’s vanity. And, oh, harking back to Rucker’s Libertarian Party theory, note that the congresswoman’s not-“government's role to define and enforce our personal morality” line is right out of libertarians’ playbook. She’s not exactly an odd fit.

take a look at $15/hr, healthscare, immigration.......she is a true socialist or communist.
You have some very valid points there, and we must never forget, that a democrat will always be a democrat, and just as foolish as any other democrat!

There are just 3 or 4 points one must know about any politician... Do they endorse any kind of gun grab, baby killing, eco-freak stuff, or refuse to honor God? If they fail on any of those items...they are useless and not worth considering !

.

I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion. (Alexander the Great)
ironglow is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-12-2019, 12:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: 3 miles NW of Brownells retail store and they keep me broke!
Posts: 1,648
Default

I won't even watch their debates! They are the party of reprobation....every last one of them!
gpa&hisguns is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-12-2019, 01:08 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: northern minnesota
Posts: 43
Default

You're right. Trump was a registered democrat for eight years.
TheCapt is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-12-2019, 01:22 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
ironglow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: rural southwestern N.Y. State
Posts: 41,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCapt View Post
You're right. Trump was a registered democrat for eight years.
Then he took short time out from his business pursuits, studied politics..and smartened right up !

.

.

I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion. (Alexander the Great)
ironglow is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-12-2019, 01:22 PM
Moderator
 
Argent11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Roswell New Mexico
Posts: 22,106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCapt View Post
You're right. Trump was a registered democrat for eight years.

Ronald Reagan was also a democrat once. From California.
Argent11 is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old 11-12-2019, 03:58 PM
Member
 
Pterodactyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Jurassic Period
Posts: 340
Default

Funny how the same guy who supports Tulsi because of her military service attacks Lt. Col. Vindman who has a service record that is at least as impressive

Science: Like magic but real
Pterodactyl is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Graybeard Outdoors forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome