Graybeard Outdoors - Reply to Topic
Thread: Interesting penetration test Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Graybeard Outdoors forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
03-16-2019 12:43 AM
105745 I watch the Alaskan shows on tv and several times after shooting a moose and leaving it overnight the hunters returned to dress it out carrying a 12ga. with slugs in case there was a bear there. I always thought that getting hit with a shotgun slug would be like getting hit with a bus. Years ago my uncle was deer hunting and saw a fox and shot it with a slug, the exit side was GONE!! The loaded shotgun under my bed has 4 buckshot and 1 slug.

03-15-2019 11:09 PM
t.r. I liked this video and can easily overlook all of the little errors. Thanks for sharing!

12-07-2018 08:51 AM
Originally Posted by bugeye View Post
I have eaten black bear bacon and ham, delicious. Grizzly's may taste like fish.
Nope just like hunter/Ed
12-07-2018 08:50 AM
bugeye dand, that's a very well thought out and worded post. Thanks.
12-07-2018 04:23 AM
dand Interesting but I don't go for it much. It would be nice if Ak Fish and Game would combine reports of all the bears the biologists have shot. I think they very often use the 12 ga to kill problem bears- but often the bears they kill are not in a charge. Over the years they have killed a lot of bears and the data might be interesting.

I think there is benefit to that big wide 12 ga lug vs some smaller slug zipping through the animal - lots of tissue damage real quick to deflect the bear if not kill it. I tend to like the 12 because it is lighter for day after day carry and I might? be a little faster tho I am in no way proficient compared to a Southern quail, rabbit, or deer hunter. Also I think the 12 ga pumps tend to be more abuse and weather tolerant long term - our stuff gets terrible beating and spends days and days in the rain and gunk yet function. However just last year was my first time to feel the need to swing a shotgun into action on a brown bear - albeit a 20 ga w grouse loads. As I crossed a stream and climbed a bank, a medium brownie popped up its head over a bush about 20-30 feet away face to face. By the time I ducked to get the gun off my shoulder, drop the stuff in my hands and stand up to shoot, ( I was hollering WHOA the whole time), all I saw was a beautiful brown bear butt and flying water heading away from me at high speed - WhEEEEEW what a lovely sight. That thing coulda been on me in 1 or 2 seconds. I carry the 12 most of the time now.

As I have posted elsewhere in GB years past, I have a friend who stopped 2 different bear (smallish) charges on Kodiak with his 30-06 (220 gr factory stuff I think). The biggest advantage was he was a very fast shooter and got the bullets well placed. Another friend, a Fish and Game biologist killed a brown bear w a 338 (ammo unknown). He told me the story and I've read his report. He's not sure if he shot and the bear hit him or the bear hit him as he fired; it knocked the rifle out of his hands. The bear veered off into the alders and died, as did the 2 bears hit with the '06. Tho at least one of the '06 bears got hit with at least one more shot as it veered off. Another co-worker killed a smallish brown bear with a 308 when it charged him at about 10 yards. It died at his feet - don't know how many shots he fired. He had a Winchester 100 and grew up shooting deer in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan - he was a good shot and knew his gun.

Regarding the FS research link posted :
I may have read the Forest Service report linked by a previous post. The research is ok as far as it goes using locally available ammo from the late 70's early 80's. I agree that .375, .338 are good choices and obtained a 338 for our most bear prone field camp. We kept 12 ga and .338 there - one for each staff. There are times aimed rifles are best. I think for those who are proficient, the faster shooting 12 ga. maybe best. And 2 guns is far better than one. Plus we could use cracker shells and rubber bullets, bean bags in the 12.

After reading the FS research long ago I set out to prove the 300 win mag WITH PROPER bullets would score far better than in the Forest Service tests. I assembled Nosler Partitions in 200, 220, old Barnes Original in 225 & 250 gr and some other premium bullets available around 1985. I set up a similar catch box hoping my catch media was similar enough. I even made a sound reduction box for the muzzle of the rifle - was super loud inside that steel warehouse That allowed me to work after hours but darn, it turned out to be a ton of work! Took a while to get some reduced loads and then I wondered how the slower rotation of the bullets might effect the outcome. A lot of nights I only fired three shots - then dig dig dig, measure, weigh, record, re-compose the catch box.........

At any rate soon my work load greatly increased and test enthusiasm decreased. I never completed or wrote up what work I did. I did have .308 Nosler partitions penetrate 17 inches without comping apart too badly.

I still feel with premium bullets, especially the bullets we have today, other cartridges would fare much better in the test: Think the solid monometal, or bonded bullets of today like Barnes and Swift etc.

In truth I think the greatest key is the shooting ability of the person with whatever gun and cartridge they choose. A fast shooter w a 30-06 and good ammo is still in good shape.

One final note: I had just moved to the little town where I was doing the testing. Our warehouse had been suffering quite a bit of vandalism before I arrived. A couple times I came out of the warehouse late at night, in the dark, rifle in hand to find a truck in the driveway. They quickly sped away. All vandalism stopped. I often wondered what it sounded like outside that uninsulated steel building when I touched off the 300. And no doubt they figured I was too crazy to mess with.
12-03-2018 06:30 AM
lloyd smale yup switch bullets in any of them and the test could turn out just the opposite. Stick a 405 hard cast in the 4570 and drop to 1400 fps and it would probably still be penetrating. Three major penetration effectors in any gun are bullet used, sectional density and velocity. I went to a Linebaugh seminar years ago and entered the penetration contest with one of my favorite loads. It was a 44 mag bisley 5.5 in gun with a very hot load pushing a 340 lfngc cast out of 5050 ww/lino at 1200fps. It beat out about every gun there including my own 458 mag using ww 500 solids and a 458 lott shooting solids. Only thing that beat it was two different 475s one shooting a 440 hard cast and one shooting one of kelly shlepps solid brass punch bullets. We had a man there (and the names slips my old mind) that spent many years in Africa and did quite a bit of elephant culling and he said flat out that the best pentration hes gotten out of any gun rifle or handgun was with his 475. He too used hardcast but had recently switched to punch bullets. He told us an elephants skull was like honey comb and very hard to penetrate and the 475 was one of very few guns he would say that consistently did it. He also said he backed his loads off to 1200 fps because anymore then that and pentration suffered. Buddy and I have done many hours of penetration testing years ago and the first thing to throw out if you want real penetration is soft nosed bullets. The second thing you have to wrap your mind around is velocity is more of a hindrance then a help. It is exactly why that 4570 didn't do as well as the 500 and why that big slow slug penetrated so well. That said if it would have been switched out to a conventional slug like a Remington that is cast out of pure lead those rifles would have eaten it for lunch. What you have there is the ideal slug load going up against probably a couple of the worse rifle loads. Id gladly wager 500 bucks I could take a 44 mag or 45 colt with a 255 grain hard cast lfn at 1100 fps and woop any of those loads in a penetration test. loaded wit a 300 at the same velocity it wouldn't even be a contest.
Originally Posted by AZ Nimrod View Post
A fun test, but meaningless for real world performance. A nice guy who can’t even use the correct terminology - “casing” instead of jacket, etc.

A better, but not definitive, test of loads for bear defense:
12-02-2018 09:14 PM
Originally Posted by mannyrock View Post
Yea, who cares if the entire lead slug disintegrates inside the Grizzly's body. We ain't gonna eat him!
I have eaten black bear bacon and ham, delicious. Grizzly's may taste like fish.
12-02-2018 08:05 PM
mannyrock Yea, who cares if the entire lead slug disintegrates inside the Grizzly's body. We ain't gonna eat him!
12-02-2018 05:58 PM
Originally Posted by Indigowolf View Post
I'd say the slugs were a winner with the MASSIVE energy dump as shown in the video. An auto loader would have reduced some of the felt kick on the back end.
What you say makes sense; it's usually best if all of the energy is used on the animal instead of a tree behind it.

I'd guess any of the three would put a "hurtin" on a grizzly, but I'm not going where there is one.
12-02-2018 02:49 PM
Indigowolf I'd say the slugs were a winner with the MASSIVE energy dump as shown in the video. An auto loader would have reduced some of the felt kick on the back end.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome