Graybeard Outdoors banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
208 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I’m no tech head, but I think I know a thing or three about the Internet and how it works. And as far as I can tell, it works pretty well.

More than 1.4 billion people around the world seem to be emailing each other a lot, and those emails get delivered a lot faster and more reliably than “snail mail.” Lots of people are innovating around the Internet – voice calling over the Internet, e-commerce, blogs, education, employment, and healthcare services, music and video streaming and downloads, and such – and lots and lots of people are profiting from those innovations and the websites and companies that operate online.

So if things are going so well, why is it that some folks are seriously thinking about taking management of the Internet away from the United States and handing control to the United Nations?

Foreign government officials from around the world meeting at a U.N.-sponsored conference in Brazil actually discussed this notion last week. It didn’t get much attention, but as we all know, that’s how bad ideas get traction.

Despite what Al Gore may think, the Internet was an invention of the U.S. government and a number of universities and other entities a couple decades ago. As the Internet became what it is today, the government created a nonprofit organization, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, to manage what was then a growing network of networks. Today ICANN does things like manage the assignment of Web sites domain names – the .coms, .orgs, .edus – for example.

But countries like China aren’t happy about U.S. control of “the tubes.” They’d rather have the U.N. run it. I wonder how the U.N. would’ve handled the situation in Burma recently when the government cut off all Internet access to all anti-government protesters, or how it would’ve handled the imprisonment in China of dissidents and reporters who emailed news out of the country.

My hunch is that we’d see the same level of management of the Internet from the U.N. that we’ve seen when it came to peacekeeping operations in Africa. Or its management of Saddam Hussein’s “Oil for Food” program. Or its monitoring of Iran’s nuclear program. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if when you look up “fool’s errand” in the dictionary, you find: “Role for United Nations’” as the definition.

The notion of surrendering management of the Internet – a global, strategic infrastructure for communications and commerce – to the UN is just a plain dumb idea. We shouldn’t be handing over something that works right to an institution that has difficulty doing anything right.

http://fredfile.fred08.com/
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,992 Posts
That pretty much summed up what most of us think of the UN. ;D ;D ;D Way to go Fred.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,772 Posts
Ohh-ohh....that's how they're going to do it. Control of free speech will be bumped up to world government agency UN thereby circumnavigating our sovereignty and BoR, while they tax us at the same time. What a racket!

....TM7
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
326 Posts
How much in taxes from the the phone line using the internet already goes to the UN?


Scott (think alot already) B
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
24,772 Posts
sdb777 said:
How much in taxes from the the phone line using the internet already goes to the UN?


Scott (think alot already) B
Yeah,,,good question. I think the plan is to tax every transmission we do or send. Thus chat, blogging, forums, etc. will or could be controlled by taxation, just like alot of things are while some agency gleans huge revenues again. This is when all citizens, left-right-green-purple-or whatever should hit the streets. Got any pitchforks and torches?

..TM7
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top