Graybeard Outdoors banner

1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
9,526 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Marsh: Join the crowd. You'll notice that the most vocal critics of Lott's comments are the demicraps who consider it a travesty and want him fired for it. They can kiss my bass. You'll notice that the minority racists can call us whites whatever they want and dang well get away with it but the first time some white guy references something that may have had some racial overtones at one time they get all fired up about it. Mebbe we oughta fire up der basses anyway and get em as they come out of the woodwork. By the way, didn't the list of those critics include the representative from kalifornica that voted against the 911 retaliatory efforts and the black racist who said that Bush was in cahoots with the Al-Queda. Lovely people, all of them, and none of them worth a schmidt. This is Mikey.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
319 Posts
Free speech for who?............

All Lott said was that we would be better of if Thurmond had won in 1948. It's a fact. Truman wouldn't have had the chance to sell us out in Korea. I don't see anything racist in Lott's remarks and even if there was, so what? Are the people of this country so stupid that they still want to pretend that racism doesn't exist?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
461 Posts
Mr. Lott

I agree that Lott didn't utter a racist word. He was just getting gushy over ol' Strom and forgot to put his mind into gear. But, look at it this way, if he loses his chair as majority leader to someone who will be less inclined to compromise our rights away we will be much better off and the Dems will be less able to get their liberal bills voted on. Mr. Lotts record really ain't too good.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Top