I've often talked with McClure, Imas and others about trigger weight and its real effect on scores.
IMO there is no real advantage to a superlight trigger in our game. Certainly, when the wind howls and you have to fight your way onto your BANK of animals -- let alone hold on a spot -- light triggers are a recipe for trouble.
I was just comparing the scores shot at Perry by the ATC folks and the comparison is interesting:
With 2400 points possible, the match winning score was 2385-119X with a match rifle. That means anything goes for trigger weight. (It also means adjustable stocks, long sight radii, aperture sights front and rear with all the accoutrements, etc, etc.)
High service rifle shooter (AFAIK) was just 19 points (less than one percent for those of you who may have been Rangers or Maroons and are math challenged) ;-) lower in 7th place. SR means a rifle that, externally at least, is just like what the recruit in basic is issued. No adjustable stocks, no handgrip mods, post front sights, limited rear sight modifications, short sight radii and 4.5 (FOUR AND A HALF) lb triggers.
(There are a gwillion -- BIG number -- tweaks and internal mods done to SRs and anything shot at Perry is a loooooooooong way from what's lugged around by grunts in the field; but you still have to deal with a rifle that's a lot less user-friendly in terms of fit and sighting than those that the match rifle shooters get to use.)
Considering that this situation is nothing new (many years the point gap is smaller) and considering the myriad other disadvantages faced by the SR shooter, IMO it's pretty obvious that a heavier trigger is no real handicap in an outdoor environment where the unprotected competitor has to deal with mother nature and all the problems she can dream up. Certainly, our 2 lb triggers in hunter can't be much of a handicap...in fact, in less than ideal conditions, they may actually help. In our own game, we often see hunter scores equal or exceed standard -- and standard rifles definitely have at least theoretical advantages over hunters in other areas than triggers. Our own nationals seldom see much differeence between the top standard scores and the top hunters; and that doesn't take any account of the advantage that standards have just because they generally shoot earlier in the day when conditions are friendlier.
I'd be curious to hear other opinions...?
IMO there is no real advantage to a superlight trigger in our game. Certainly, when the wind howls and you have to fight your way onto your BANK of animals -- let alone hold on a spot -- light triggers are a recipe for trouble.
I was just comparing the scores shot at Perry by the ATC folks and the comparison is interesting:
With 2400 points possible, the match winning score was 2385-119X with a match rifle. That means anything goes for trigger weight. (It also means adjustable stocks, long sight radii, aperture sights front and rear with all the accoutrements, etc, etc.)
High service rifle shooter (AFAIK) was just 19 points (less than one percent for those of you who may have been Rangers or Maroons and are math challenged) ;-) lower in 7th place. SR means a rifle that, externally at least, is just like what the recruit in basic is issued. No adjustable stocks, no handgrip mods, post front sights, limited rear sight modifications, short sight radii and 4.5 (FOUR AND A HALF) lb triggers.
(There are a gwillion -- BIG number -- tweaks and internal mods done to SRs and anything shot at Perry is a loooooooooong way from what's lugged around by grunts in the field; but you still have to deal with a rifle that's a lot less user-friendly in terms of fit and sighting than those that the match rifle shooters get to use.)
Considering that this situation is nothing new (many years the point gap is smaller) and considering the myriad other disadvantages faced by the SR shooter, IMO it's pretty obvious that a heavier trigger is no real handicap in an outdoor environment where the unprotected competitor has to deal with mother nature and all the problems she can dream up. Certainly, our 2 lb triggers in hunter can't be much of a handicap...in fact, in less than ideal conditions, they may actually help. In our own game, we often see hunter scores equal or exceed standard -- and standard rifles definitely have at least theoretical advantages over hunters in other areas than triggers. Our own nationals seldom see much differeence between the top standard scores and the top hunters; and that doesn't take any account of the advantage that standards have just because they generally shoot earlier in the day when conditions are friendlier.
I'd be curious to hear other opinions...?