I don't have alot of money to put into a hunting rifle. So I went to the local walmart and I have narrowed it down to two rifles. The wall mart weatherby with wood stock no sights and in 300 (not sure if 300 weatherby or winchester. The tag just said "weatherby magnum .300). Or the remington 700adl with laminated stock in 30-06. The remington is $430.00 and has iron sights, and the weatherby is $470.00. I only shoot iron sights for hunting. I go after hogs, deer, black bear, and when I get the chance elk and mulies. I just joined the air force and will be hunting new and exciting places. So which rifle is the best for my buck? The remington that I don't have to do anything to but sight it in and get a sling, or the weatherby with a more potent round and pay to have sights put on it? Is the weatherby that much better of a rifle to make up for the money difference?