Graybeard Outdoors banner

1 - 20 of 97 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
782 Posts
Boeing

These pictures have made the rounds before. I've heard plausible explanations but know I don't remember what they were. (Wife says I can't remember what I went to the store for.)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
457 Posts
Ques'que ces?

It's a French web-site, right. Just e-mail the poor guy and tell him he's right and we're going to surrender. It'll make no sense but he'll understand all about surrendering :wink:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
44,135 Posts
Matt;
It's not just the French anymore, that are the surrender types...

There seem to be some in this country that are ready to "throw in the towel' and let the terrorists go on attacking us and finally win..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,130 Posts
I got it a UFO took the plane and its crew -right?Or is this false????????????
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
356 Posts
It is a simple question and it does deserve an explanation. We went to war over it. Thousands of lives, and billions of dollars have been spent. Calling the question stupid because it's on a French web site doesn't do justice to informing the citizenry of this republic. If it's a cover up or a false flag operation we need to know. If an airliner crashed there, there should be tons of aluminum in the wreckage. If it was a cruise missile, or a planted bomb, there wouldn't be.

Read this and then tell me the French, historically, are cowardly:
http://www.exile.ru/2003-October-02/war_nerd.html
BTW, I'm not French, and have no connection with them, but I like to know the truth. Can you handle the truth?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,130 Posts
What is it you don't understand,a plane load of people took off and according to you and a few others just disapeared and the rest of us acknowledge that it crashed into the Pentagon if you disagree tell us where the plane and the people are.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
356 Posts
To summarize it I guess the guy wants to know how a multi-ton airplane can hit a building and not even knock down a hole big enough for the airplane to go through. The wings should have knocked down a bigger part of the wall, IMO. I guess the I'm wondering where the plane is too. I've said my two cents worth.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,066 Posts
This notion fits right in there with the idea that the moon landing was done in a studio, that Dubya was appointed, that Slick Willie was impeached because of sex, that the administration knew about 9/11 ahead of time, that they have lied about the reasons for going back into Iraq and on and on and on.

One of the great things about this country is that you can believe anything you want--even if it's pure unadulterated BEEEEEE EEEEESSSSS.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
26,058 Posts
Now I ain't gonna say the photos there are genuine, dunno. Not sure I recall the views from TV well enough to say if they are or are not. But I will say IF they are genuine they do indeed call a lot into question. For instance very minor damage for a plane the size that was supposed to have hit there and no damage at all to the lawn out front. No plane wreckage either. Very strange indeed IF those images are not altered and are the genuine article taken soon after the "crash".

This notion fits right in there with the idea that the moon landing was done in a studio,
Of that there is NO DOUBT at all in my mind. Man has never set foot on the moon and likely never will. I've seen enough of the original images enough times to have convinced myself they were filmed under studio conditions rat here on earth. Will go to my grave believing that.

The folks who run our government as a whole are one lying, cheating, scheming bunch of crooks of the worst order. I believe darn little of what they say and certainly do not believe more than a very tiny percentage of them have the best interest of the people of this country in mind when they act.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,130 Posts
Beard,you lost a lot of respect from me in the above statement.there are to many proofs to even attempt at this late date the landing.I am amazed that what I thought was a intellegent man making those remarks.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
356 Posts
I have to agree with IntrepidWizard on the moon landing. I believe they went there and did all the things they said they did. I agree with GB about our politicians being a bunch of liars and cheats. I hope the scientists, engineers and pilots who accomplished the greatest feat in recorded history are a more honest bunch than the politicians, and I believe they are. The picture of Armstrong, an American, stepping onto the surface of the moon still makes me choke with pride. I watched it as it happened on an old black and white TV. I hope to live long enough to see a man step onto the surface of Mars.
As to the plane into the Pentagon, it should be a simple matter to resolve the questions. I know a plane crash leaves a lot of very small pieces, but they do exist. I actually do believe a plane hit the building, but I'd be happier seeing the details, instead of being told I don't need to know, or classifying me a surrender monkey or a conspiracy nut.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,130 Posts
You cannot have this many people involved in the Moon Landing or the Pentagon crash without somebody speaking out,people tend not to keep secrets,but I will keep going back to the same statement if it is true what happened to the Boeing and it's crew and passangers because it is missing----------is that hard to understand?
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
26,058 Posts
And if you folks believe the moon landing was real then you too have lost the respect I had for your intelligence. If you watch the videos with eyes and mind open you'll know there is no way they were on the moon but could have only been in a film studio.

What?

Well as a for instance when the first man "on the moon" stepped out the sun was behind him in the photo clearly shown. BUT he was fully lighted from the front as was the lander. By what? Could only have been artifical lighting placed just to illuminate him.

How about when the feet of the lander were shown up close there was no sand or dust on them even tho much was raised or would have had to be by the engines.

Same on take off. The lander just leaped into the sky yet not one single bit of dust or sand was raised. How did they do that without the engine blazing fire? Yet no fire was seen and no dust was raised.

I could go on but won't. Believe what you want but it shows me you're a pawn easily convinced by anything the government says.

There has never been a man on the moon. Can't ever be either. Why? The Van Allen Radiation Belt. Look it up. No way under the sun was the thin walls of the ship they were "supposed" to be in able to protect the men from the radiation. You guys will believe anything the government feeds you.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,130 Posts
Beard,you have to be kidding ,sun reflection off the moon dust was the lighting,the "dust" which was brought back as well as the rocks answer your next question and scientist not the Government has gone on and on and on with the answers,also ,again a conspiracy of that magnitude would not be kept quiet no more than the rumors on this board,one does need to read out side of this forum.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
26,058 Posts
Jeez, the naivety of the US population absolutely amazes me. The entire space program was a joke and the biggest hoak foisted on the people of this country that ever has been. If you were paid the bucks those guys were to convince the public you'd lie for them too. Sorry I'm dead serious. Anyone who actually believes the stories to me ain't thinking straight.

Sun reflecting off moon dust? Dust from where? There ain't no air there remember? Any dust actually stirred up by the landing would have long since been settled before the guy went outside in the movie script. And if it did there would have been some on the feet of the lander but there wasn't. Nope sorry can't buy that story.

Hey I brought some "moon dust" and "moon rocks" back from a couple of my trips west too. Same stuff those guys delivered. Do you honestly think a chunk of the moon if it could be had would be that much different than a chunk of earth? Why? The table of the elements is the same here as there. They have nothing we don't.

How folks can believe the lies told during those years is beyond me.
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
26,058 Posts
Back to the Pentagon for a moment. Let's take a look at one of the photos in TM7's "proof" link.



Anyone care to explain how it is so nice and neat and nearly round? Did that plane NOT have wings? If so why did the bricks on each side not even get a scratch from them?

What's that black stuff above the center of the hole? Smut from smoke? From a fire? A blast?

Dunno. I honestly have no clue what happened that day at the Pentagon. Maybe a plane did hit it. Maybe it didn't. To be honest I've seen nothing that convinces me either way. But the more proof photos like that are offered the more convinced I become another government cover up of somethng is afoot. Maybe what really hit was a missle not a plane. Dunno. Oh this one I just have to say I've not seen enough evidence either way to be convince what happened that day.

Ya want my theory? No I realize you don't. It might mess up your preconcieved notions that the government never lies. I think they shot the plane down the damage to the Pentagon came from a missle that missed.
 
1 - 20 of 97 Posts
Top